Mike Powell not doing his job
« Thread started on: Aug 26th, 2004, 09:21am »
This is a copy of the message I send to the FCC everyday ... I would like to know your views on it. I encourage this people that agree with me to send it to them as well in your own personalized manner.
-----copy of message-----------------------------------------
Hi There Mike,
First and foremost I would like to commend you on the short bit you provide to the public about yourself.
..."Welcome to my Internet home page! I hope that you will find this site a valuable source of information about me and my capable staff, as well as the Federal Communications Commission and the significant work performed by its dedicated employees.
Best regards, Michael Powell"...
You do not signify what America wants as a whole. I am sorry to inform you that you are making notions as we speak in the legal world that not only damper free speech and the free America we supposedly live in but they hinder equality, and major radio conglomerates (that have special interests) hide behind you. There is not a day that I wake up searching for news that justifies any decision you have made the whole time you have been Chairman of the FCC.
Why should you listen to me...? I am a 20 y/o male that is concerned with free speech in addition to keeping the laws open and not geared toward large corporate interest. I am sure you feel justified in every decision you have made since you have been made chairman.
This is not a threat email it is just an email of one of the people that feel bold enough to contact you and your staff. If you keep at the rate you are going people my age when they turn 40 will be talking about the "Mike Powell scandal". The reason this email is in general terms is because at no time do you at the FCC include young people and what they want to view on the "waves".
Every decision you make is in regards to "Families" and right-winged rich people. It seems as though you favor those two groups only. You view sex and lucid terms as distasteful whereas people in my generation view them as entertainment. Do you seek to ban free entertainment and mass production of it? Do you seek to make it harder to be readily available? If so you are like any human...if you know its there then you can choose not to listen or watch. Your regulations and enforcement of them does not constitute our amendments. You are in direct violation of freedom to speak your mind. You seem to be to distracted by the party you serve.
You are definitely not just in the way you fine people and do not fine other offenders of regulation. Here are a few examples...
Oprah Winfrey Show Syndicated Harpo (A guest said “tits” on May 20th, 2004) indecency Mary J. Blige
60 Minutes CBS Network Viacom The "S" Word indecency
Good Day New York Good Day New York WNYM The "F" Word indecency
Ryan Seacrest KIIS - Los Angeles Clear Channel The "F" Word indecency
Oprah Winfrey Show Syndicated Harpo Sex talk (graphic) indecency
Regular Guys WKLS - Atlanta Clear Channel Graphic Description Of Sex indecency
Elliot In The Morning WWDC - Washington Clear Channel Graphic Description Of Sex indecency
American Idol/Simon Cowell Fox Network Fox Flips His Middle Finger indecency
Why have you not fined these people or waved a red flag? You seem to only fine the people you have it out for.
So you have one or two options Mike.
1- You may fine these people tomorrow or receive this email till I get a non automated response
2- You may justify why you haven't fined these people and drop all other suits pending against others in violation of indecency
Whichever you choose you will continue to receive this email and possibly in hard copy everyday until you come out with a justified and valid response "WE" the people will let you know if any response you make is valid or justified. A press release response is ok too and could possibly be deemed valid all dependant upon its content.
AMERICA WILL MOVE IN NUMBERS AGAINST YOU, SHOULD YOU IGNORE OR CONTINUE TO IGNORE THIS EMAIL IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED IT ONCE, MOREOVER IF YOU ONLY SEND AUTOMATED OR RESPONSES NOT DIRECT AND THROUGH A SPOKES PERSON. WE WANT A RESPONSE PERSONALLY YOU ARE THE MAN BEHIND THE DECISIONS AND WE NEED TO KNOW WHY.